How it works

One event. A dozen newsrooms. One place to read them side by side.

Most news apps hand you one outlet’s version of a story and leave the rest to chance. We do the opposite. When something happens, we gather how every newsroom covered it, group their reporting into a single story, and show you who said what. You read the spread, not a single angle.

From a hundred articles to one clear story

  1. 01

    We watch the newsrooms, not the feed

    We pull coverage straight from the publishers themselves: wires, national dailies, regional desks, the trade press. Thousands of sources, checked continuously through the day. Nothing waits on a human to notice it first.

  2. 02

    Articles about the same event get grouped

    The moment an article lands, we match it against stories already forming, using the people, places and organisations it names, the words it shares, and when it was published. Twelve reports on the same event collapse into one story that says "covered by 12 sources."

  3. 03

    A story waits until the coverage settles

    We hold a new story for about 45 minutes before publishing it, so slower outlets have time to weigh in and you see a fuller picture on first read, not a thin two-source draft. When something is clearly breaking, with four or more newsrooms already on it, we skip the wait and publish straightaway.

  4. 04

    You see the agreement, and the disagreement

    Open any story and you get the headline, every source covering it, and how closely they line up: aligned, mixed, or divided. Where outlets tell it the same way, that is worth knowing. Where they split, that is worth knowing too.

A few things we won’t do

We never rewrite the news

We don’t generate articles or invent facts. Every headline links back to the newsroom that reported it, and that is where the credit and the clicks go. We organise other people’s journalism. We don’t replace it.

Grouping is a rule, not a guess

Deciding which articles belong to the same story runs on a fixed, repeatable method, not a mood. When we’re unsure whether two reports are the same event, we keep them apart. A duplicate story is a mild annoyance; merging two unrelated events is the kind of mistake that breaks trust, so we lean the safe way.

Calm headlines, no outrage bait

We pick the plainest headline that still tells you what happened. No all-caps, no cliffhangers, no engineered anger. The point is to inform you quickly, then get out of your way.

Late sources are never missed

A story keeps growing after it publishes. As more outlets cover the same event, the source count climbs and the summary fills out. Come back an hour later and the story is more complete than when you left it.

Read the story, not the spin.

Start with today’s coverage and see how the same events look across every newsroom.